Jump to content

Talk:Earth's magnetic field

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleEarth's magnetic field was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 22, 2013Good article nomineeListed
October 22, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Earth's magnetic field magnitude

[edit]

Hi, the second paragraph states: The magnitude of Earth's magnetic field at its surface ranges from 25 to 65 μT (0.25 to 0.65 G) [3]

This seems to be outdated or incorrect, as the magnetic magnitude in South Atlantic can be as low as 22μT. Source 1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Atlantic_Anomaly Source 2: http://www.geomag.bgs.ac.uk/education/earthmag.html#_Toc2075549

Perhaps a specialist can review... THX.. Shaberer-en (talk) 13:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a reliable source, and I was not able to find the value 22μT in the second source. Can you point out where it is in the second source? Constant314 (talk) 19:18, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Constant314,
Thx for your response, sorry for the delay in replying.
the second source states 22,000 nT (=22μT)
http://www.geomag.bgs.ac.uk/education/earthmag.html#_Toc2075549
same this one (approx middle):
https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/FutureEO/Swarm/Swarm_probes_weakening_of_Earth_s_magnetic_field
While this one states 22,500 nT:
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2016.00040/full
(this is reference #1 in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Atlantic_Anomaly)
THX! Shaberer-en (talk) 10:43, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I saw it this time in the bgs ref. Looks good. Make the change if you wish, Constant314 (talk) 15:20, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
thanx - my first update! Shaberer-en (talk) 13:49, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

  • There are uncited statements, including entire paragraphs.
  • There are many sources listed in "Further reading". These should be considered for inclusion in the article or removed.

Is anyone interested in fixing up this article, or should it go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 08:31, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. Charlotte (Queen of Heartstalk) 02:09, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are a lot of uncited passages, including entire paragraphs. The sources listed in "Further reading" might be helpful for adding inline citations. Z1720 (talk) 15:28, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

South pole of Earth's magnetic field

[edit]

@Chetvorno While I have no fond attachment to my edit, should we even have this wonky factoid in the intro? The existing sentence does not, in my opinion, give information. The label on the dipole is a minor detail, not a significant aspect of the Earth's field, and yet it is hard to explain the issue clearly. Johnjbarton (talk) 23:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]