User talk:LordGulliverofGalben

Kadambini Ganguly

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Kadambini Ganguly article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Adam ^(talk) 04:42, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Got the message

Peer review Kolkata

Hi! A request has been made for peer review of Kolkata. Could you please help improving the article? Thanks a lot.--Dwaipayanc 11:14, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure buddy, more than willing to help.

Thanks for the alphabetical organisation of the template on topics related to Kolkata. I was thinking to do the same, but so busy in creating articles related to Kolkata that I could not find time! Kolkata needs a lot of supportive articles (espesially in the administrative, economic and cultural aspects), as we are trying to pass through Peer Review, and without good supporting articles, the main article fails to stand solidly. Thank you.--Dwaipayanc 03:14, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

India related links

	Links for Wikipedians interested in India content
Newcomers: Welcome kit \| Register: Indian Wikipedians \| Network: Noticeboard (WP:INWNB) Browse: India \| Open tasks \| Deletions Contribute content: Wikiportal India - Indian current events (WP:INCE) India collaboration of the week (WP:INCOTW) - Category adoptions

Welcome!! --Gurubrahma 13:11, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kadambini Ganguly

I have expanded, destubbed and nominated Kadambini Ganguly for Did you know. Regards. -- P.K.Niyogi 01:34, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added some research for you at Talk:Kadambini_Ganguly -- Aarshiya84 03:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 9 November, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kadambini Ganguly, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

The Continent of Circe and Thy Hand, Great Anarch!

Hi, consider putting this template to these articles. Jacek Kendysz 14:32, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

bengalren

Thanks for the help on the bengal related stuff.Baka man 19:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bhavabhushan Mitra

Will you please consult its Talk page and intervene ? Thanks--BobClive 17:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Lord, for your kind participation. I just came across your note on my talk page (which I do not consult regularly).--BobClive 06:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your note

Thanks for the tip! Am on the job

Rimi 08:14, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I am giving a paper on Wikipedia today or tomorrow here at JU, after that I will have some time to contribute. Definitely agree reagrding the unsatisfactory nature of most of these articles. Will chomp slowly and steadily through them. Thanks again Rimi 05:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

West Bengal Portal

Portal:West Bengal has been vastly improved by riana_dzasta and S .D. ¿п?, with automated selection of articles. It is now a Featured portal candidate. Please have a look. Regards -- P.K.Niyogi 02:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I agree that more inputs are required, particulalrly in the culture-related sector. Unfortunately, the topics suggested by you are not my cup of tea. Regards. -- P.K.Niyogi 03:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Madhusudan Dutt

Hi! I happened to notice (admittedly very late) that you had removed the "tone" template for the article Michael Madhusudan Dutt.

Now, months later, it still includes statements such as "(h)e was an exceptionally gifted student," "(h)e was very imaginative," and "what the Abbot of St. Maurice spoke of Manfred [essentially a series of praises] can equally be applied to the life of Madhusudan."

In addition, there are many unsourced statements assuming knowledge of his feelings like "...he desired to be an Englishman..." "(h)e had no respect for that tradition and wanted to break free..."

Do you mind if I put the template back? Otherwise, could you explain why you believe this template does not apply to that page? --Kuaichik 05:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Belated) thanks! I'll ask some Bengali Wikipedians as you suggested and also post a comment on the talk page before adding that template back. --Kuaichik 16:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GREETINGS

WISH YOU A HAPPY NEW YEAR!--BobClive (talk) 08:16, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello LordGulliverofGalben! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Sasthi Brata - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chyawanprash

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Chyawanprash, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. N419 BH 07:05, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chyawanprash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chyawanprash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chyawanprash(2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. N419 BH 04:07, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Your addition to National Eligibility Test has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Dpmuk (talk) 14:16, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emilie Schenkl

The article Emilie Schenkl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim to notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Garamond Lethet c 20:08, 27 October 2013 (UTC) Garamond Lethet[reply] c 20:08, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emilie Schenkl for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emilie Schenkl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emilie Schenkl until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Garamond Lethet c 13:32, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kundu Special for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kundu Special is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kundu Special until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Roller26 (talk) 04:44, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

175th Year Commemoration Volume. Scottish Church College, April 2008.

Greetings!

Could you please provide a full citation for the 175th Year Commemoration Volume. Scottish Church College, April 2008 which you've added for example in the Scottish Church College article? It must be all the way back to 2009 when that was inserted already... :o

Thank you very much in advance!

Cheers! Jayaguru-Shishya (talk) 14:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Supriya Chaudhuri

The article Supriya Chaudhuri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Currently, there is not a single of coverage about her from an independent source in the article. Searches did not turn up any either, so he fails WP:GNG, and doesn't come close to meeting WP:NSCHOLAR.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Khorang 11:16, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Supriya Chaudhuri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Supriya Chaudhuri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Supriya Chaudhuri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Khorang 11:18, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]